Comprehension For SBI PO Set – 36

Political ploys initially hailed as master-strokes often end up as flops. The Rs. 60,000 crore farm loan waiv­er announced In the budget writes off 100% of overdues of small and mar­ginal farmers holding upto two hect­ares, and 25% of overdues of larger farmers. While India has enjoyed 8%-9% GDP growth for the past few years, the boom has bypassed many rural areas and farmer distress and suicides have made newspaper head­lines. Various attempts to provide re­lief (employment guarantee scheme, public distribution system) have made little Impact, thanks to huge leakages: from the government’s lousy delivery systems So. Many economists think the loan waiver is a worthwhile alter­native to provide relief.

However the poorest rural folk are landless labourers, who get neither farm loans nor waivers. Half of the small and marginal farmers get no loans from banks and depend entirely on money­lenders, and will not benefit. Besides, rural India is full of the family holdings rather than individual holdings and family holdings will typically be much larger than two hectares even for dirt poor farmers, who will, therefore, it denied the 100% waiver. It will thus fail in both economic and political ob­jectives. IRDP loans to the rural poor In the 1980s demonstrated that crock­ed bank officials demand bribes amounting to one-third the intended benefits. Very few of the Intended ben­eficiaries who merited relief received it. After the last farm loan waiver in 1990, many bank went slow on fresh farm loans for some years. This waiver will similarly slow down fresh loans to de­serving fanners. While overdues 10 co­operatives may be higher, economist Surjit Bhalla says less than 5% of farmer loans to banks are overdue i.e. over­dues eidst for only 2.25 million out of 90 million farmers. If so, then the 95% who have repaid loans will not benefit. They will be angry at being pena­lised for honesty.

The budget thus grossly overes­timates the number of beneficiaries , It also underestimates the negative ef­fects of the waiver-encouraging willful default in the future and discouraging fresh bank lending for some years. Instead of trying to reach the needy, through a plethora of leaky schemes we should transfer cash directly to the needy using new technology like bio­metric smart cards, which are now be­ing used in many countries, and mobile phones bank accounts. Then ben­efits can go directly to phone accounts operable only by those with biometric cards, ending the massive leakages of current schemes.

The political benefits of the loan waiver have also been exaggerated since if only a small fraction of farm families’ benefit and many of these have to pay bribes to get the actual benefit. Will the waiver really be a mas­sive vote, winner? Members of joint families will feel aggrieved that, despite having less than one hectare per head, their family holding is too large, to qual­ify for the 100% waiver. Ail finance min­isters. of central or state governments, give away freebies in their last bud­gets, hoping to win electoral regards. Yet, four-fifth of all incumbent govern­ments are voted out. This shows that beneficiaries of favours are not nota­bly grateful, while those not so favoured may feel aggrieved, and vote for the Opposition. That seems to be why election budgets constantly fall to win elections in India and the loan waiver will not change that pattern.

1. Why do economists feel that loan waivers will benefit farmers in distress?

(a) It will improve the standard of living of those farmers who can afford to repay their loans but are exempted.

(b) Other government relief mea­sures have proved ineffective.

(c) Suicide rates of farmers have declined after the announce­ment of the waiver.

(d) Farmers will be motivated to increase the size of their family holdings not individual holdings.

(e) The government will be forced to reexamine and im­prove the public distribution system.

2. What message will the loan waiver send to farmers who have re­paid loans?

(a) The Government will readily provide them with loans in the future.

(b) As opposed to money lenders banks are a safer and more reliable source of credit.

(c) Honesty is the best policy.

(d) It is beneficial to take loans from co-operatives since their rates of interest are lower.

(e) None of these.

3. What is the author’s suggestion to provide aid to farmers?

(a) Families should split their joint holding to take advantage of the loan waiver.

(b) The government should in­crease the reach of the em­ployment guarantee scheme.

(c) Loans should be disbursed directly into the farmers using the latest technology.

(d) Government should ensure that loans waivers can be implemented over the number of years

(e) Rural infrastructure can be improved using schemes which are successful abroad.

4. What was the outcome of IRDP loans to the rural poor?

(a) The percentage of bank loan sanctioned to family owned farms increased.

(b) The loans benefited dishonest money lenders not landless laborers.

(c) corrupt bank officials were the untended beneficiaries of the loans.

(d) It resulted in the Government sanctioning thrice the amount for the current loan waiver.

(e) None of these.

5. What are the terms of the loan waiver?

(A) One-fourth of the overdue loans of landless labourers be written off.

(B) The Rs.60,000 crores loan waiv­er has been sanction for 2.25 million farmers.

(c) any farmer with between 26 percent to 100 percent of their loan repayments overdue will be penalized.

(a) Only A

(b) Only B

(c) Both B and C

(d) All A, B, C

(e) None of these.

6. What is the author’s view of the loan waiver?

(a) It will have an adverse psychological impact on those who cannot avail of the waiver.

(b) It is a Justified measure in view of the high suicide rate among landless labourers.

(c) It makes sound economic and political sense in the existing scenario.

(d) It will ensure that the bene­fits of India’s high GDP are felt by the rural poor.

(e) None of these

7. Which of the following cannot be said about loan waiver?

(A) Small and marginal farmers will benefit the most,

(B) The loan waiver penalises de­serving farmers.

(C) A large percentage i.e. ninety five per Cent of distressed farm­ers will benefit.

(a) Only C

(b) Both A and C

(c) Only A

(d) Both B and C

(e) None of these.

8. Which of the following will defi­nitely be an impact of loan waivers?

(A) Family holdings will he split into individual holdings not exceed­ing one hectare.

(B) The public distribution system will be revamped.

(C) Opposition will definitely win the election

(a) None

(b) Only A

(c) Both A and B

(d) Only C

(e) All A, B and C

9. What impact will the loan waiver have on banks?

(a) Banks have to bear the en­tire brunt of the write off.

(b) Loss of trust in banks by big farmers.

(c) Corruption among bank staff will increase.

(d) Farmer will make it a habit to default on loans

(e) None of these.

10. According to the author what is the government’s motive In sanc­tioning the loan waiver?

(a) To encourage farmers to opt for bank loans from moneylenders.

(b) To raise 90 million farmers out of indebtedness.

(c) To provide relief to those marginal farmers who have the means to but have not repaid their loans.

(d)To ensure they will be re­elected.

(e) None of these.

Directions (11-13): Choose the word which is most nearly the SAME in meaning to the word printed in bold as used in passage.


(a) mandatory

(b) present

(c) incapable

(d) lazy

(e) officious


(a) surveys

(b) entreaties

(c) ruses

(d) sliders

(e) assurances.


(a) vindicated

(b) intimidated

(c) offensive

(d) wronged

(e) disputed.

Directions (14-15): Choose the word which is most OPPOSITE in meaning to the word printed in bold as used in the passage.


(a) dearth

(b) missing

(c) superfluous


(e) least


(a) ranked

(b) unqualified for

(c) lacked

(d) inept at

(e) unworthy of

Answer key:

1. (b) 2. (e) 3. (c) 4. (c) 5. (e) 6. (a) 7. (b) 8. (a) 9. (d) 10. (d) 11. (b) 12. (c) 13. (d) 14. (a) 15. (e)